Throughout the cycle
|
Dissemination of information
|
- The government and/or Multistakeholder Forum publish information and documents in plain and accessible language that can be understood quickly and completely.
|
- The government and/or Multistakeholder Forum use different channels commonly used by citizens, civil society and other stakholders, including traditional and new media (for example, newspapers, television, radio, email, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, WhatsApp, Slack, etc.), as appropriate, for awareness raising and dissemination of progress updates.
|
- The government and/or Multistakeholder Forum established direct communication with relevant stakeholders to raise awareness of open government, the OGP and opportunities to get involved.
|
- The government and/or Multistakeholder Forum use visual materials, infographics, videos and other appropriate media to communicate relevant information and updates on the process and its outcomes to a non-expert audience.
|
Spaces and platforms for dialogue and co-creation
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum has a strategy to bring in additional government and non-government stakeholders in the OGP process.
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum coordinates different face-to-face events around the region, which are open and accessible to any interested members of the public, civil society and other stakeholders (they must be at suitable times and locations).
|
- An online forum is established to enable ongoing dialogue across stakeholders involved in the OGP process.
|
Co-ownership and joint decision making
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum is jointly chaired by the government and civil society.
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum includes a variety of government and non-government stakeholders (e.g. citizens, civil society organisations, government offices, subnational governments, parliament, academia, the private sector, etc.) that provide different perspectives.
|
- The members of the Multistakeholder Forum make joint decisions regarding the process and content of the action plan.
|
- The members of the Multistakeholder Forum undertake to comply with ethical standards (honesty, transparency, avoidance of conflicts of interest and acting in the public interest) by means of signing an ethics and conflict of interest declaration. The declaration clearly defines the sanctions to be applied in case of breach.
|
When developing the plan of action
|
Dissemination of information
|
- The government and/or Multistakeholder Forum use different channels commonly used by citizens, civil society and other stakeholders, including traditional and new media (for example, newspapers, television, radio, email, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, WhatsApp, Slack, etc.), as appropriate, to update on the development of the action plan, along with the opportunities to participate.
|
- The government and/or Multistakeholder Forum publish all written contributions to the development of the action plan on the OGP website/webpage (for example, consultation responses).
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum publishes, via the national OGP websites, its reasoning behind the selection of the commitments for the action plan, including justification for commitment proposals that were not adopted.
|
Spaces and platforms for dialogue and co-creation
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum engages civil society and other stakeholders in setting the agenda for the action plan. These include selecting priority themes, identifying problems to be tackled and suggestions for commitments.
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum ensures that there are a range of opportunities for civil society and other stakeholders to take part in developing the plan, including an outreach programme around the country and online discussions.
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum oversees the formation of working groups including relevant stakeholders from government and civil society, to discuss and refine ideas into commitments.
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum collects feedback from stakeholders on the draft action plan. This should be appropriately disseminated and include different mechanism for feedback from the stakeholders (e.g., written responses, online discussions, surveys, face-to-face or remote meetings) and be open for an adequate period.
|
Co-ownership and joint decision making
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum jointly designs and agrees the action plan development process (e.g. the number, location and format of the events), although the government is ultimately responsible for the quality of the process.
|
- Commitment proposals are assessed by the Multistakeholder Forum in an open and transparent process. All parties have equal veto power over commitments included in the action plan.
|
- Government and civil society, via the Multistakeholder Forum, jointly agree the commitments to be included in the action plan.li>
|
When implementing, monitoring and assessing the action plan
|
Dissemination of information
|
- The Multistakeholder Forum oversees the publication of regular government and civil society updates on the progress of commitment in addition to government self-assessment reports.
|
- The government publishes a dashboard on the national website that provides up-to-date information on the status of the commitments in an accessible and easy-to-understand format for an average citizen.
|
Spaces and platforms for dialogue and co-creation
|
- The government establishes a public consultation period of at least four weeks on its self-assessment and proactively publishes and disseminates it in different channels (e.g. mailing lists of participants in the action plan development and on the OGP website/webpage).
|
- Government provides the civil society members of the forum to meet with the minister in question, at least twice a year, to review the process, the self-assessment and IRM report.
|
- The government provides an interactive space on the website/webpage to allow the stakeholders to discauss the progress in commitments. The government should answer their questions or comments within 20 days.
|
- If the IRM report is publicly launched, the government will send a high level representative (minister or senior official) responsible for the OGP process to discuss the findings in open dialogue with the participants.
|
Co-ownership and joint decision making
|
- Working groups including different stakeholdersare established to implement and monitor each commitment. The members should be selected using appropriate methods (e.g., by the Multistakeholder Forum or through an open call.
|
- The government proactively organises frequent meetings (at least quarterly) for each working group, which produce regular progress reports (at least twice a year) on the implementation of the commitment (agreed jointly9. These updates should form the basis for the government self-assessment report.
|